Elon Musk threatens Apple if it integrates OpenAI into its devices
Elon Musk has threatened to ban Apple devices at his companies if Apple integrates its operating system with OpenAI
On June 10, Apple announced new AI features and a partnership with OpenAI to incorporate ChatGPT technology into its devices. Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and owner of social media company X, criticized this move as a security risk. He stated that any visitors to his companies would have to leave their Apple devices stored in a Faraday cage to prevent security breaches. Apple claimed that its AI features are designed with privacy at their core, utilizing a mix of on-device processing and cloud computing. Elon Musk dismissed these assurances, suggesting that Apple’s reliance on OpenAI indicates a lack of internal AI capability and raises security and privacy concerns.
Ben Bajarin, CEO of Creative Strategies, wondered if many would follow Elon Musk’s stance, emphasizing Apple’s efforts to educate the public on the security of their private cloud system, which anonymizes and firewalls user data. Elon Musk’s criticism of OpenAI is not new. In March, he sued OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, accusing them of deviating from their original mission to develop AI for humanity’s benefit and becoming profit-driven. Elon Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 but has since started his own AI venture, xAI, to compete with OpenAI and provide an alternative to ChatGPT. Apple and OpenAI did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comments on his statements. The situation highlights the ongoing tensions and differing philosophies between foremost tech leaders regarding AI development and integration.
[Image Source: MarketWatch]
Pingback: Elon Musk uses a South-Indian movie poster to relate it to Apple & OpenAI Merger - NEWS-21-INDIA - Equitable News portal ever known
can zithromax treat gonorrhea zithromax in canada pediatric dose of zithromax zithromax 500 mg dose azithromycin zithromax price
Isolated and inexperienced: A portrait of the judge overseeing Trump’s documents case from veterans of her courtroom
спрут onion
Judge Aileen Cannon had been on the federal bench for little more than a year when a senior judge offered to preside over one of her first criminal trials in her isolated south Florida courthouse.
“It’s very lonely,” Senior Judge Paul C. Huck told CNN of Fort Pierce, a small fishing and citrus community on the edge of the Southern District of Florida where Cannon is the only federal judge. “It’s a pretty sleepy town with a pretty sleepy courtroom.”
https://blackspruta.com
блэк спрут onion
Huck ultimately presided over the March 2022 criminal trial – not because Cannon needed help, he said, but because he enjoys volunteering for trials in courts across Florida.
“I thought I’d go up there and just spend some time with her and get to know her better,” Huck said of Cannon, whom he recalled as “very smart” and “very personable.”
Two years later, Cannon is now presiding over one of the most consequential and complex cases in America: the criminal prosecution of former president Donald Trump over his handling of the nation’s secrets. And she’s attracting nationwide scrutiny for how she’s approached the case.
Since Trump was first indicted a year ago, Cannon has dragged out the proceedings in ways that have flummoxed legal scholars and put a trial initially scheduled to begin last month on hold indefinitely.
Several attorneys who have practiced in front of Cannon – and who spoke to CNN for this story – pointed to her isolation as one explanation for her conduct. Cannon’s solitary post in the Fort Pierce courthouse, one that rarely sees high-profile action, deprives her of the informal, day-to-day interactions with more seasoned judges who sit at the other courthouses and could offer her advice, the lawyers told CNN.
https://blacksprutbsgl.com
блэк спрут ссылка
They also said Cannon’s lack of trial experience, both as a lawyer and a judge, is apparent. In her seven years as a Justice Department attorney, Cannon participated on the trial teams of just four criminal cases. And on the bench, she’s only presided over a handful of criminal trials – and Huck took over one of them.
For this account of Cannon’s judicial demeanor, CNN spoke to ten attorneys who have had cases – both criminal and civil – before her. The lawyers spoke to CNN on the condition of anonymity because of the professional and ethical risks of speaking to press about a sitting federal judge in front of whom they practice.